|
KMID : 1001320190460020005
|
|
Social Welfare Policy
2019 Volume.46 No. 2 p.5 ~ p.25
|
|
|
Exploring the Theory of Social Welfare Philosophy Based on Social Justice: Comparison of Rawls and Sandel
|
|
Yoo Tae-Han
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Korean society was changed rapidly and is expected to experience chabges in the future. In preparation for this change, the government referred to completion of Welfare state. In order for social welfare intervening in human life to expand into a welfare state, a universal system, universal norms that can justify the system are required, and these normative standards should include not only the present but also future values. For this, social welfare philosophical approach and discussion are essential. Nevertheless, in Korean society, it is still insufficient. Traditionally, there are deontological justice and teleological justice in the classification of philosophical studies, Rawls. J. and Sandel. M are the best known scholars in Korean society. Both scholars have implications in social welfare in common that they refer to the social welfare system as alternative to utilitarian norms. In addition, the two theories clearly distinguish between the premise of individual and society, the justification of intervention, and the limit of the theory, which will show how a philosophical basis is appropriate for Korean society. In order to complete the welfare state in the Korean society, which is experiencing various conflicts such as generation and local conflict, it seems that a universal normative basis is needed for members of society to achieve social consensus.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Social welfare philosophy, normative study, Justice, public goods
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|